<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gen Blog - Official Blog of Wakefield Family History Sharing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog</link>
	<description>www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 13:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Prince Maurice Victor Donald of Battenburg</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/05/prince-maurice-victor-donald-of-battenburg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/05/prince-maurice-victor-donald-of-battenburg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 13:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casualty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KRRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ypres]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a recent visit to Belgium I was able to visit the grave of Prince Maurice and as a result of that can now add more information to my previous blog. While reading my newest purchase – yes it has either family history or military connections I came across an entry for the following and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a recent visit to Belgium I was able to visit the grave of Prince Maurice and as a result of that can now add more information to my previous blog.</p>
<p>While reading my newest purchase – yes it has either family history or military connections I came across an entry for the following and found it quite interesting as years ago I transcribed Eton College War Memorials for no other reason than something to research and with a couple of family members who were KIA – I was hooked and as my family and friends know I can now spot a war memorial at a great distance !</p>
<p>So, who caught my interest this time?</p>
<p>Prince Maurice Victor Donald of Battenberg, was the son of Princess Beatrice and cousin to the Tsar and Kaiser.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/1891_Maurice-04.jpg"><img title="1891_Maurice-04" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/1891_Maurice-04-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>Maurice was born in October of 1891 at Balmoral and was the first prince to be born in Scotland for nearly 300 years.</p>
<p>He served as a professional soldier in the KRRC – into which he was commissioned in 1910 and moved with his battalion France in August of 1914.  A few short months later there were only 10 of the original officers left.  On the 13<sup>th</sup> of October Prince Maurice was Mentioned in Despatches.  The battalion moved to near Zonnebeke and on the 27<sup>th</sup> of October, while leading his men forward he was killed by a shell burst.  During this time, his cousin, Prince Arthur of Connaught, was an ADC to Sir John French and he made every effort to attend his cousin at the dressing station – but was too late.   Kitchener suggested that he be brought ‘home’ but his family, mainly his mother, decided he should rest with his friends and his men and to this end Prince Arthur made the arrangements.</p>
<p>The family had a memorial service in the Chapel Royal attended by King Geore V and Queen Mary along with other members of the family, the Prime Minister and Lord Kitchener.  The Prince of Wales is reported to have said that he had found the names of many of his friends and fellow officers on casualty lists, including his cousin Prince Maurice, his equerry, Major Cadogan and two of his father’s equerries.  He is also reported to have said that he should not have a friend left soon.</p>
<p>The Prince’s elder brothers also fought in the war – Prince Alexander was invalided home with an injured knee and Prince Leopold, a platoon leader in the Grenadier Guards was hospitalised with a chill and he was sent home – according to some, this was not a bad thing.</p>
<p>Prince Maurice Victor Donald of Battenberg rests along with many others in Ypres Town CWGC Cemetery &amp; Extension.  The cemetery has two sections &#8211; one is CWGC only, walk up the steps at the far right and you enter the town cemetery with a small CWGC section to the left of the path.  But, as  you reach the top of the small run of steps don&#8217;t focus on the commonly recognised CWGC headstones, take a look to your left and you will see a lone headstone, with the plot marked out by kerbstones.  Here rests Prince Maurice</p>
<div id="attachment_567" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/DSCF05991.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-567" title="DSCF0599" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/DSCF05991-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Carol Sklinar 2012</p></div>
<p>To visit the Commonwealth War Graves Commission website <a href="http://www.cwgc.org/">click here</a></p>
<p>To visit Major and Mrs Holt’s Battlefield <a href="http://www.guide-books.co.uk/">click here</a></p>
<p>To purchase any of Major and Mrs Holt’s Battlefield Guides visit Pen &amp; Sword  <a href="http://www.pen-and-sword.co.uk/">click here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/05/prince-maurice-victor-donald-of-battenburg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Titles as first names</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/titles-as-first-names/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/titles-as-first-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1901]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkshire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When searching through volumes of parish registers &#8211; yes,  in the days when you actually could look through the registers, I remember coming across many titles as christian names.  My initial thought, as a beginner in family history, was wow! Someone of note in my tree.  Yes, that feeling lasted only a few short weeks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When searching through volumes of parish registers &#8211; yes,  in the days when you actually could look through the registers, I remember coming across many titles as christian names.  My initial thought, as a beginner in family history, was wow! Someone of note in my tree.  Yes, that feeling lasted only a few short weeks until I realised that many parents gave their children such names as Squire, Baron, Duke and Earl.  The girls were also given titles as their first name for example, Lady and Princess.  A search of  one of the census found one young lady was named &#8216;Lady May Mafeking Pretoria Barnes Smith&#8217;.  What had been happening around the time of her birth to warrant her names?</p>
<p>Before we learn a little more about Lady May, I looked in the 1901 census for Squire Ramsden and within a small area there are 5 men with that name ranging in ages from late 50&#8242;s to teens.</p>
<p>Leading up to the time of Lady May&#8217;s birth Britain and her forces were fighting in South Africa.  Mafeking was one of the most famous British actions in the Second Boar War (Oct. 1899- May 1900), most of us have heard of the Relief of Mafeking.  Pretoria, the city surrendered to the British in June of 1900 &#8211; all this was happening at the time that little Lady May was getting ready to come into the world.</p>
<p>Well, who is Lady May ?  Firstly, as in my previous post, her name has been mis-transcribed &#8211; What&#8217;s new ?  In the 1901 census Lady May can be found on the index as &#8216;Lady MayMagekins&#8217; aged 10 months (being registered in the June Qtr of 1900) and her parents are James Barnes and his wife Annie.  James and his wife also fell fowl of a mis-transcription &#8211; there names should be James Barnes Smith and Annie Barnes Smith.</p>
<p>James, born and living in Hull was a bird dealer, while his wife was born in Cardiff.  The family in 1901 was as follows :-</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765635"><strong>James Barnes Smith</strong></a></td>
<td width="9%" align="left"><strong>59</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765636"><strong>Annie Barnes Smith</strong></a></td>
<td width="9%" align="left"><strong>35</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765637"><strong>Alice Barnes Smith</strong></a></td>
<td width="9%" align="left"><strong>15</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765638"><strong>James Barnes Smith</strong></a></td>
<td width="9%" align="left"><strong>12</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765639"><strong>Annie Matilda B Smith</strong></a></td>
<td width="9%" align="left"><strong>11</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765640"><strong>Elizabeth Barnes Smith</strong></a></td>
<td width="9%" align="left"><strong>8</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765641"><strong>Christmas John B Smith</strong></a></td>
<td width="9%" align="left"><strong>5</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765642"><strong>Clarisa Barnes Smith</strong></a></td>
<td width="9%" align="left"><strong>2</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765643"><strong>Lady May Magekins</strong></a></td>
<td width="9%" align="left">10 Months</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td width="90%" align="left"><a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1901&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=28765644"><strong>Pretons Barner Magekins</strong></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As you can see Lady May has been transcribed over two lines and totally wrong and with her name being rather wrong the second part of her name, has given the impression of a separate person- that is until you look at the actual document.</p>
<p>To follow Lady May in the 1911 census I came up with nothing, but that did not dishearten me aswell, it could end up as anything in the transcription.  After trying to find her brother Christmas in the 1911 and other siblings I tried Freebmd for a death and sadly found that she had died aged 3 years old and the transcribers have cross referenced her with both Barnes and Smith :-</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#999999">BARNES</td>
<td>Lady May M P S</td>
<td>3</td>
<td><a href="http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl">Hull</a></td>
<td>9d</td>
<td><a href="http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl">167</a></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#cccccc">Smith-Barnes</td>
<td>Lady M M P</td>
<td>3</td>
<td><a href="http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl">Hull</a></td>
<td>9d</td>
<td><a href="http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/cgi/search.pl">157</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It makes me wonder how many other people relatives have been wrongly transcribed  giving them no chance of being found.  I know the number will be huge and would be fascinated to learn of the unusual or funny ways these names have been transcribed and placed in the on-line indexes  -  <a href="mailto:carol@wakefieldfhs.org.uk"><strong>Let me know</strong></a> and I&#8217;ll post them here.</p>
<p>Note: The Second Boar War brought Baden-Powell to the fore and Winston Churchill was taken prisoner and held in Pretoria but escaped.</p>
<p>Sources &#8211; Wikipedia, Ancestry, FreeBMD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/titles-as-first-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t I find him in the 1891 census ?</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/why-cant-i-find-him-in-the-1891-census/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/why-cant-i-find-him-in-the-1891-census/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1891]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, if you are just starting out on your family search and you are looking for a relative, there is a chance you will look, look again and then think what a stupid hobby and take up topiary &#8211; as the hedges will grow faster that your tree is. I was foolishly going off on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you are just starting out on your family search and you are looking for a relative, there is a chance you will look, look again and then think what a stupid hobby and take up topiary &#8211; as the hedges will grow faster that your tree is.</p>
<p>I was foolishly going off on a tangent and looking for Queen Victoria in the 1901 census, then thought better of it as she had died in the January, so off to search the 1891.</p>
<p>I had looked for H M Victoria, Queen and Victoria born in 1819 but to no avail, desperation drove me to search for THE in the christian name box, lots of entries and some were very surprising including, The Leadbeater who when you look at the original census form is Thos Leadbeater.</p>
<p>Then I thought I&#8217;d try HER and see what that brings up! Well, it brought up 70 hits and the one that made me laugh and feel very sorry for the beginner in family history looking for their relative.  So, I&#8217;m looking for HM Queen Victoria among these 70 hits and I find this &#8211; <strong>Her Vest Black Van. </strong>Now, is this a name, no! It is a wonderful example of someone who has looked at a census document and written what they think they see.  One question to ask, and an important question is, does this person have knowledge of British surnames? Another important question is, do they have a knowledge of British places?  In this case I think the former is certainly a NO!  But, they have a knowledge of English words, hence the transcription.  It&#8217;s like the old quiz show &#8216;say what you see&#8217;.</p>
<p>Who is <strong>Her Vest Black Van</strong>, well she turns out to to be a her after all, but a he! He is Herbert Blackburn the 7 month old son of John and Mary Blackburn and living Bolton. He was one of 8 children aged between 20 years old and 7 months.  John  worked as a printer compositor to feed his family and some of his children worked in the cotton mills.</p>
<p>The moral of this story is don&#8217;t just search for the obvious.</p>
<p>Another moral is think out of the box.</p>
<p>If all else fails put your relative on the &#8216;back burner&#8217;, he is not going anywhere, and follow another side of the tree.  Then, go back refreshed and full of enthusiasm, open your mind to searching wider i.e. searching by first name and year of birth with either a county of town &#8211; it will take you longer but all the spelling variatons turn up.  This would not help in the case of <strong>Her Vest Black Van</strong>, but you would certainly have had a chuckle along the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/why-cant-i-find-him-in-the-1891-census/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Absent Voters List 1914-18 War &#8211; update</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/absent-voters-list-1914-18-war-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/absent-voters-list-1914-18-war-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absent Voters Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electoral Registers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wakefield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WW1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkshire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while ago I mentioned the the Absent Voters Lists as being a valuable source when looking for a WW1 soldiers army number, but I thought I would just update this and add to the information I told you about. So here goes &#8211; In the General Election of 1918 all those not at &#8216;home&#8217;, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while ago I mentioned the the Absent Voters Lists as being a valuable source when looking for a WW1 soldiers army number, but I thought I would just update this and add to the information I told you about.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Voters-lists.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-552" title="Voters lists" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Voters-lists-150x150.jpg" alt="Carol Sklinar 2010" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>So here goes &#8211; In the General Election of 1918 all those not at &#8216;home&#8217;, those who were away from their place of residence were classed as Absent Voters.  The reasons you were away could be for example, working, visiting family or serving your country in WW1.  The information for someone serving his King and Country usually included the following :- The man&#8217;s name, service and regiment along with rank and service number and his home address.  I say this information is usually included but in Morley his name and HM in a column are the only information you are getting, but it is still worth knowing he served.</p>
<p>It was an Act of Parliament passed on 6th February 1918 that allowed service men to register  and obtain their vote &#8216;at home&#8217;.  The first lists were published on 15th October 1918 and again on 15th April 1919 and the details were provided by the voters.  Men aged 21 and over could supply information about their vote, so for us family historians, a young man under the age of 21 but still serving his country could not vote.</p>
<p>Also, something to be remembered &#8211; a soldier&#8217;s number was not his for his service.  A soldier changed his service number for many reasons including changing regiment.  You will find many service records or CWGC information with the words &#8216;formerly&#8217;, very kindly giving a previous service number.  If you search for a serviceman by just his number you may find many men who were issued that number.  For example a search of the SWDTGW for 2497 comes back with 100 men issued that number.  It was not until 1920 that a unique number was issued to service men.</p>
<p>Something else to bare in mind is that during WW1 Officers were not given service numbers but by WW2 numbers were issued and again they were unique.</p>
<p>This wonderful source of information for <strong>Wakefield</strong>, has been transcribed and can be found<a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/abscent%20voters.htm"> here</a>, the information has also been put on to a cd and is useful for those not wishing to use the internet and is available <a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/Shop.shtml">here </a>along with many other useful tools for family historians.</p>
<p>When looking for AVL&#8217;s you may like to try your local history library, local archives or pose a question on a local messageboard &#8211; it may save you time.  Please note:- there is a chance they may not have survived in your area, so be prepared to use other sources to find the service number of your man i.e newspapers.  Years ago a service number was a must for you to take your research further, now with the internet and some very useful websites a service record, if it has survived can be found by inputting varying degrees of information i.e. name and town if that is all you know, but don&#8217;t forget to allow for transcription errors and a search could get longer if a name and town, in all the spelling variations, brings up nothing &#8211; you may have to resort to just a town, a little long winded but does eventually pick up all the wonderful spelling variations that transcribers try to put in our way.</p>
<p>Many family historians are a dogged bunch and are not easily put off by a name or town spelt in a way that bares no resemblance to what it actually should be.  I think sometimes it is just &#8216;lets pick a few letters, jumble them up and that will do&#8217;.</p>
<p><strong>A selection of Absent Voters Lists online</strong></p>
<p><strong>Wakefield<a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/abscent%20voters.htm"> click here </a>- </strong>search by constituency</p>
<p><strong>Leeds<a href="http://www.leeds.gov.uk/Leisure_and_culture/Libraries/Records_and_archives__access/Family_history__Leeds_Absent_Voters_List_191418_War.aspxhttp://www.leeds.gov.uk/Leisure_and_culture/Libraries/Records_and_archives__access/Family_history__Leeds_Absent_Voters_List_191418_War.aspx"> click here </a>- </strong>search by surname</p>
<p><strong>Accrington <a href="http://www.leeds.gov.uk/Leisure_and_culture/Libraries/Records_and_archives__access/Family_history__Leeds_Absent_Voters_List_191418_War.aspx">click here</a></strong> &#8211; search by name or constituency</p>
<p><strong>Grimsby &amp; Cleethorpes</strong> <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/de/delighted/voters.html">click here</a> &#8211; search by name</p>
<p><strong>Woodchurch <a href="http://www.woodchurchancestry.org.uk/ww1/avl.html">click her</a>e</strong> &#8211; complete list</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/absent-voters-list-1914-18-war-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Titanic records</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/titanic-records/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/titanic-records/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a few short days it is 100 years since Titanic was lost at sea and in recognition of this Ancestry have just launched a set of records relating to this, including survivor list, crew lists, deaths at sea and grave lists. Some of this information  is very interesting for those of you who have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a few short days it is 100 years since Titanic was lost at sea and in recognition of this Ancestry have just launched a set of records relating to this, including survivor list, crew lists, deaths at sea and grave lists.</p>
<p>Some of this information  is very interesting for those of you who have relatives connected with the disaster.</p>
<p>One example of these records is for Charles C Jones, he was referenced as body no. 80.  Estimated to be about 45 years old with light coloured hair.  His clothing is listed as :- evening dress, grey leather lined overcoat and black boots.  And his effects were as follows :- Silver watch with C. C. J., gold pencil, three gold studs, letters, knife, eyeglasses, America Express Co. cheque book.  $19 in bills in back pocket, 13/4 halfpenny and £2 5s 3d in purse.</p>
<p>Charles  of Bennington, Vermont was a 2nd class passenger  and the form was signed for by Jas. H Donnelly.</p>
<p>To view these records visit then  <script src="http://www.tkqlhce.com/s9118suqfhjmtqijw4AD9E6AD?target=_blank&amp;mouseover=Y" type="text/javascript"></script>click on the home page click view all records in the &#8216;What&#8217;s happening on Ancestry&#8217; section.</p>
<p>Find My Past have also included Titanic records in their collections        <!--START MERCHANT:merchant name Find My Past from affiliatewindow.com.--><br />
<a href="http://www.awin1.com/cread.php?s=216564&amp;v=2114&amp;q=110022&amp;r=117099"><img src="http://www.awin1.com/cshow.php?s=216564&amp;v=2114&amp;q=110022&amp;r=117099" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<!--END MERCHANT:merchant name Find My Past from affiliatewindow.com--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/04/titanic-records/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beaulieu War Memorial</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/beaulieu-war-memorial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/beaulieu-war-memorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casualty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cwgc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a quest to find the memorial in the village.  Before my visit someone had said they thought it was in the church.  In the village shop, and on this occasion I am not ashamed to say I spoke to two ladies, who were both convinced there wasn&#8217;t one but disagreed as to where it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a quest to find the memorial in the village.  Before my visit someone had said they thought it was in the church.  In the village shop, and on this occasion I am not ashamed to say I spoke to two ladies, who were both convinced there wasn&#8217;t one but disagreed as to where it was.  I was told to go the the Motor Museum and ask there.  The wonderful local chocolate shop at least were honest and said they should know but didn&#8217;t.  Not one to give up I spied a lady walking across from the village school with arms full of baskets &#8211; this wonderful person said &#8216;yes, follow me&#8217;.  So less than 20yds off the road there was the memorial &#8211; so thank you, who ever you are!</p>
<p>One name seems to stand our more than any other on the Beaulieu War Memorial, could be because it is the longest.</p>
<p>Stanton Degge Wilmot-Sitwell born on 25 July 1896, in the Kensington Reg. District,  the son of Francis Stanton Wilmot Sitwell and Mary Innes the daughter of Capt., Charles E Farquharson.</p>
<p>In 1901 the family were living at The Hall, Holbrook, Derbyshire.  The family consisted of Francis and Mary and their children Robert B aged 6, Stanton aged 4 and Francis E aged 2 along with 4 servants ranging from parlour maid to nursemaid.</p>
<p>2nd September 1914 Stanton was one of the gentleman being appointed Probationary Second Leiutenants.</p>
<p><a style="text-align: center; background-color: #f3f3f3;" href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0361.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-541" style="border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" title="DSCF0361" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0361-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p style="font-size: 9px;">2012 C Sklinar</p>
<p>March 1915 Stanton is noted in the Gazette as being granted the temporary rank of Lieutenant.</p>
<p>Stanton served in the Royal Marines, Royal Navy Div.  He was KIA during the battles of Gallipoli and died on 14 July 1915 being remembered on the Helles Memorial along with nearly 21,000 other identified casualties.  The memorial at the moment (2012) is undergoing major renovations after years of severe weather conditions and seismic activity.</p>
<p>The family seem to be from the Derbyshire area, so where is the link to Beaulieu ?     Well, found a link to the Lymington area &#8211; Francis S Wilmot-Sitwell died in the Lymington Registration District in 1929.  There is also a death for a Mary in Christchurch but will shelve that one until further proof comes my way.  Just as an afterthought I looked up a Probate entry for Stanton and the entry tells that Probate was granted in 1920 at Winchester.  The Lymington war memorial has no mention of the Wilmot-Sitwell family, so why the Beaulieu memorial?</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p>Plantagenet Roll of the <a href="http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ObnB2K0Pm-gC&amp;pg=PA333&amp;lpg=PA333&amp;dq=stanton+degge+wilmot-sitwell&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=UyGcVeac-p&amp;sig=tW87-QPxKrkE-sAhXO0UKDT6AYY&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=FiNaT7zbDoTQ0QWs35C8DQ&amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;q=stanton%20degge%20wilmot-sitwell&amp;f=false">Blood Royal </a></p>
<p>1901 census transcribed as Stanton D Wilmothwell &#8211; <em>RG13</em>; Piece: <em>3227</em>; Folio: <em>108</em>; Page: <em>2</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/beaulieu-war-memorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1911 census &#8211; a family history snippet</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/1911-census-a-family-history-snippet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/1911-census-a-family-history-snippet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Waldo Lionel Churchill has been my last entry and while trying to find his parents on the 1911 I came across this gem. The enumerator who collected Charles Churchill&#8217;s sheet was not too pleased due to his crossing out. Charles and his wife, Emily were aged 69 and 68 respectively but Charles had put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Waldo Lionel Churchill has been my last entry and while trying to find his parents on the 1911 I came across this gem.</p>
<p>The enumerator who collected Charles Churchill&#8217;s sheet was not too pleased due to his crossing out.</p>
<p>Charles and his wife, Emily were aged 69 and 68 respectively but Charles had put them both on the same line, The second line he had put that Emily had a room at Lambeth and he had a room at Westminster.  The enumerator had filled in that both were married and had been for 46 years, they had had 7 children and lost 2.</p>
<p>The third line, normally for a third person stated that on April 2th (yes looks like th) slept at Hackney and had no occupation, but later the enumerator completes an entry for waiter.</p>
<p>The fourth line stated they have one room.</p>
<p>The enumerator also completed the entry for one being from Westminster and the other from Lambeth.  The icing on the cake or the enumerator was fed up, was that he put Emily&#8217;s age in the male column.</p>
<p>For the signature Emily signed and where the postal address should have been is Charles&#8217; name with the address of 26 Trelawney Road, Hackney being squashed in below.</p>
<p>Ten years previous (1901) the couple at living on Queen&#8217;s Road, Hackney where Charles aged 57 is a Porter Officer.</p>
<p>1891 has the couple still in Hackney but now 76 Richmond Road and Charles is a Refreshment Room Attendent and the couple have one son, Charles aged 24 living with them &#8211; he is a Carman.</p>
<p>1881 Charles and his family are living at 100 Great Suffolk Street, Southwark &#8211; Charles is a waiter and his children are as follows &#8211; Charles 14 a soap packer ; Louise 11 scholar, William 8 scholar; Margaret 6 scholar &#8211; still a few children missing but someone else will have to find them.  I just thought you might have been interested in the fact that not every one is perfect and not everyone can fill in forms -nothing changes, does it ? Except now many of the forms are on line.</p>
<p>Source  1911 census: Class: <em>RG14</em>; Piece: <em>1140</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/1911-census-a-family-history-snippet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Waldo Lionel Churchill</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/charles-waldo-lionel-churchill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/charles-waldo-lionel-churchill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casualty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Waldo Lionel Churchill was born on 16 May 1883, the son of Lt. Col. Charles Morant Churchill, JP (b 19 May 1842) and his wife Ellen Harriette Augusta Meade-Waldo (b 4 Nov 1856). In the census of 1891 the family are living at Everton Grange, Milford, the family being : Charles Morant Churchill aged [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Waldo Lionel Churchill was born on 16 May 1883, the son of Lt. Col. Charles Morant Churchill, JP (b 19 May 1842) and his wife Ellen Harriette Augusta Meade-Waldo (b 4 Nov 1856).</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">In the census of 1891 the family are living at Everton Grange, Milford, the family being : Charles Morant Churchill aged 48, Lt Col. Retired Pay, HMS, JP Dorset born in Dorset; Ellen Harriet A Churchill aged 34  born in Cork, Ireland ; Charles Waldo Lionel Churchill aged 7 born in Maidstone ; Frances C E Churchill aged 10 also born in Maidstone + Edmund Wm (?) Waldo father in law aged 61 late 1st Life Guards, JP Kent born in Dawlish, Devon ; Cicely E M Waldo mother in law aged 38 born in Derbyshire ; Margaret A M Waldo sister in law aged 9 born  in Rushall, Kent; Katherine A M Waldo sister in law born in Barmore Castle, Beal aged 7 and finally 10 servants &#8211; <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=14389434">Daniel M Davis</a> 29 <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=14389301">Albert Henry Gregory</a> 19 <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=14389336">Charlotte Jane Brown</a> 23 <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=24933476">Annie Phillips</a> 26 <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=24933255">Mary Jane Fossey</a> 26 <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=24933409">Kate E Carpenter</a> 26 <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=24933752">Annie Saneroft</a> 17 <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=24933498">Emily Peters</a> 16 <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=24933499">Annie Palr  Htkins</a> 49 <a title="View Record" href="http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1891&amp;indiv=try&amp;h=24933338">Emma Pearson</a> 38 all being born in Hampshire, London or Dorset.</p>
<div id="attachment_531" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0325.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-531" title="DSCF0325" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0325-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2012 C Sklinar</p></div>
<p style="color: #000000;">Charles joined the 3rd Battn., Hampshire Regt., in June of 1900.  He had been with M.I. in South Africa from December 1901 with the rank of 2nd Lieut and was attached to the 28th Mounted Infantry.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">On 31st March 1902 The Damant&#8217;s Horse, part of Lt. Col. Cookson&#8217;s column were along the Brak Spruit and came in contact with a convoy of burghers and followed in to Boschbult farm.  The superior Boer forces attacked the column who managed to entrench before nightfall and the Boers retired at nightfall.  Charles was wounded during the day and died of his wounds on 2nd April at Klerksdorp.  His final resting place in South Africa has not been determined, but some websites say that he rests in Wimbourne.  His memorial is however, on the wall of Wimborne Minster.</p>
<p style="color: #000000;">
<p style="color: #000000;">Officers died &#8211; <a href="http://glosters.tripod.com/BoerC.htm">South Africa 1899 &#8211; 1902</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/charles-waldo-lionel-churchill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Henry Umfreville Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/henry-umfreville-wilkinson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/henry-umfreville-wilkinson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casualty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cwgc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middlesex Regt.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milford on Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Great War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The memorial to Henry can be found inside the church at Milton on Sea, but who was Henry ? Well, he was the son of Henry Marlow Wilkinson (b 4 Aug. 1827 Godshill, I.O.W d 9 Dec 1908, Milford-on-Sea ) and his wife Florence Amy Kemp-Welch (b 1852 in Brixton, Surrey, died on 5 Jun 1927 in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The memorial to Henry can be found inside the church at Milton on Sea, but who was Henry ?</p>
<p>Well, he was the son of Henry Marlow Wilkinson (b 4 Aug. 1827 Godshill, I.O.W d 9 Dec 1908, Milford-on-Sea ) and his wife Florence Amy Kemp-Welch (b 1852 in Brixton, Surrey, died on 5 Jun 1927 in Milford on Sea) who married in Christchurch in the winter of 1886.  Henry Marlow Wilkinson was a clergyman living with his wife, family and servants in Milford vicarage at the time of the 1901 census &#8211; Henry Umfreville was aged 10 and like his sister Marie he was not listed as a scholar. Henry Marlow was from a family of clergymen.</p>
<p>Ten years before in 1891, Henry Marlow Wilkinson was aged 63 while Florence his new wife was aged 38 and for children she had 3 under 5 &#8211; John, Cyril and Henry aged 10 months.</p>
<p>By the time of the 1911 census Florence was a widow and living at Milford Corner with her 4 children and 4 servants in a 17 roomed house.  Good news for family historians Florence added that she had had 7 children but had lost 3 by the time of the census.  Who were the other children ?  In 1911 John Rothes Marlow Wilkinson was 23 and a student ; Cyril Hacket Wilkinson was 22 and a student ; Henry Umfreville Wilkinson was 20 and a student  and finally, Marie Cecile Florence Wilkinson aged 17 and also a student.</p>
<div id="attachment_526" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0259.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-526" title="DSCF0259" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0259-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2012 C Sklinar</p></div>
<p>From the memorial we know that Henry Umfreville was a student at Oxford and attained a B.A., he also was a member of the Civil Service and it was during this service in Mlanji, Nyasaland that he died on 17 March 1916 that he died aged 25. I&#8217;ve not found a lot about Henry but will his brother who was a soldier during the Great War be any different ?</p>
<p>John Rothes Marlow Wilkinson, as we know he was the elder brother of Henry U but he has more of a story to tell.</p>
<p>In the London Gazette John is mentioned as to be a Second Lieutenant in the Territorials dated 17 December 1909.   Another mention gives information regarding Second Lieutenant Wilkinson being transferred from the 7th Bttn Hampshire Regt., to the Duke of Cambridge&#8217;s Own (Middlesex Regt.,) He was a University candidate on 24 March 1911but would not be getting pay of allowances prior to 7 February 1912.</p>
<div id="attachment_527" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0260.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-527" title="DSCF0260" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0260-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2012 C Sklinar</p></div>
<p>Soldiers who Died in the Great War tells us information we have already gained from the London Gazette but that he was Killed in Action on 10th September 1914 near Mons.  But a look at De Ruvigny&#8217;s Roll of Honour gives an insight as to who the young man was.  He was a handsome young man, with I suppose you could say he had film star looks &#8211; well you could if this was the 1940&#8242;s or 50&#8242;s.  He had good strong features and a neat moustache.  His education was at Winchester College and Worcester College (1907-1911) and was Captain of the colleges boat club.  We know he was killed near Mons, but what happened ?  A Private from C Coy., 4th Middlesex Regt., wrote &#8220;On Sunday 23 August, we were entrenched in front of a convent, when Capt., &#8230;..gave Lieut. Wilkinson an order to take half his platoon (two sections) to reinforce A Coy.  The Coy. was at the left of our positions and was hard pressed.  We took up position under heavy fire at a group of houses.  Your son went into one of the houses, and was heard directing the fire of his two sections through the skylight of the root.  He directed his fire so well that he forced the Germans to retire from his front.  it was from this house that he was overwhelming numbers of Germans coming through the wood to his front.  The Germans came on again until they were within 200 yards.  Lieut. Wilkinson came out of the house into the trench.  It was here that he got the order to retire.  He got the order twice, but would not take it, as he thought it was not an official order.  Eventually he got the order from the G.O.C. to retire.  It was then I noticed he was limping.  To retire we had to go through barbed wire ; here we got separated owing to the heavy shell and rifle fire.  I am very sorry to say that I was not the only man of those two sections to get away from that place.  No officers could give me any information of Lieut. Wilkinson.  I reported to the C.O. what had happened and told him that Lieut. Wilkinson was a very brave man.  He replied, &#8216;Yes, I know that, and I am very sorry to have lost him&#8217; &#8230; I must say your son was a man in very sense of the word.  I think he was as brave a gentleman as one could meet here.  I told this to Capt.,&#8230;&#8230;. I think I have an idea of a brave officer, as I went through the South African War and have eight clasps to my medal&#8221;  Such sad news for a family to hear but good to know that a Private thought enough of his Lieutenant to write to his family and inform them what really happened.  So many other families could only wonder or imagine the fate of their loved one.</p>
<p>He was 26 years old when he was KIA and rests in St. Symphorien Military Cemetery, Hainaut, nr Mons, Belgium.</p>
<p>Within a two year period Florence  had lost another two of her boys but she did live on for another few years.</p>
<p>Papers of the Wilkinson of Milford  family can be found in the <a href="http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/wmss/online/1500-1900/wilkinson-family/wilkinson-family.html">Bodleian Library </a></p>
<p>James Marlow Wilkinson was one of over 2000 people who corresponded with <a href="http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/namedef-5136">Darwin </a></p>
<p>Roll of honour of sons and daughters who gave their lives in the <a href="http://www.ebooksread.com/authors-eng/richard-ussher/roll-of-the-sons-and-daughters-of-the-anglican-church-clergy-throughout-the-worl-hci/page-8-roll-of-the-sons-and-daughters-of-the-anglican-church-clergy-throughout-the-worl-hci.shtml">Great War</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/henry-umfreville-wilkinson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naval Dockyard, Portsmouth</title>
		<link>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/naval-dockyard-portsmouth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/naval-dockyard-portsmouth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carol</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ark Royal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMS Victory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMS Warrior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naval Dockyard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portsmouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Naval Dockyard is world famous as the home of Nelson&#8217;s flagship &#8211; HMS Victory, but the dockyards are also home to the Mary Rose and HMS Warrior.  Well, everyone talks about HMS Victory, so I shall give it a miss except to say that I am glad that I went on board and can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Naval Dockyard is world famous as the home of Nelson&#8217;s flagship &#8211; HMS Victory, but the dockyards are also home to the Mary Rose and HMS Warrior.  Well, everyone talks about HMS Victory, so I shall give it a miss except to say that I am glad that I went on board and can appreciate the  every day conditions the men and boys had to endure &#8211; well I can imagine.  The conditions during a battle must have been horrendous &#8211; noise, the organised and well practised Battle Stations and the accidents of one mis-timed move, all this in cramped quarters with many men not being able to stand upright.</p>
<p>The crew would have consisted of over 800 men and boys &#8211; 11 Officers, 48 NCO&#8217;s, 80 Petty Officers, over 500 seaman and 40 boys plus approx., 150 Marines of various ranks.  I always thought the Marines were the extra military side of a battle &#8211; the sharp shooters and able to go from land to sea and just as capable on either.  But I was told that they were what you would call a peace keeping service &#8211; keeping peace between the seaman and the officers as unruly men could cause a great loss of life during a voyage.</p>
<div id="attachment_513" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF00372.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-513" title="DSCF0037" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF00372-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">HMS Victory 2012 C Sklinar</p></div>
<p>So, here she is &#8211; at the moment her top masts have been removed for work to be carried out on them and part of her has an outer shell of scaffolding and part of the 150ft Bowspirit has been removed.  To make it easier for the Oldest Commissioned War Ship to survive the masts and the bowspirit are now hollow wrought-iron masts,  from a ship called the &#8216;Shah&#8217; in the 1880&#8242;s. These are lighter than the original wooden masts and require less maintenance.  The original main mast would have been taken from a tree with a 3ft diameter fir, spruce or pine, such woods are known to be strong but flexible.   You can only go onboard with a guided tour but it is worth the wait for a tour to begin and there is lots to do while you wait.</p>
<p>HMS Warrior &#8211; The largest, most heavily armed and heavily armoured warship.  No opponent dated to challenge her. She was 418 ft in overall length (compared to HMS Victory 227ft) and the 60 years since HMS Victory showed in the technology.  She had at her centre an armour plated box to protect her guns and machinery and this was impenetrable at even close range with the latest guns. She had the recent innovation of watertight compartments only made possible by her iron construction.</p>
<div>
<dl id="attachment_515">
<dt><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0114.jpg"><img title="DSCF0114" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0114-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>HMS Warrior 2012 C Sklinar</dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p>Not only was HMS Warrior feared for her guns but she was also fast, very fast &#8211; under sail she could reach 13.75 knots but she also had steam power made possible via her 10 boilers (each with 4 furnaces) and could reach 14.33 knots using these but using both steam and sail 17.5 knots could be made.  Her armament was also impressive. Warrior had the new breach-loading guns now firing shells &#8211; normal cannon balls bounced off ironclads.  Warrior unlike Victory had only one gun deck &#8211; she was longer but much more stable and able to carry heavier guns, with each gun having a crew of 18.</p>
<div>
<dl id="attachment_516">
<dt><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0117.jpg"><img title="DSCF0117" src="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0117-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></dt>
<dt><a href="http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/DSCF0117.jpg"></a>HMS Warrior 2012 C Sklinar</dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p>The crew of 705 men were made up of : 42 Officers and Midshipmen, 3 Warrant Officers an d 45 NCO&#8217;s, 401 seaman and boys + plus the engineering staff &#8211; 12 Chief Engineers and Engineers, 66 Stokers and Trimmers as well as 3 Rloyal Marine Officers and 24 NCO&#8217;s and Artilliary men.  Compared to Victory the decks were a lot more spacious and airyn and brighter. Also by now sailors weren&#8217;t &#8216;press ganged&#8217; and volunteered.  After serving a set time they could achieve a pension</p>
<p>HMS Warrior was first of the Black Battle Fleet of the 1860&#8242;s and by 1875 Britain had built a further 22 armour-plated battleships.  The latter 22 had no sails but could steam 3 times further than Warrior without refuelling, but HMS Warrior never had to fire a shot in anger, surely that shows how successful she was &#8211; a real success story.</p>
<p>Along with the museum sections there is also a Harbour Tour a fantastic way to see H M Fleet and the harbour.  Sadly, Ark Royal, the one I wanted to see as my father had been a guest of honour on board her some years ago.  He received a cheque, the money raised by the crew to take a Normandy Veteran back to France and my father was chosen.  He had no idea he was going and didn&#8217;t normally go on the RNA trips but he did as he was told and turned up at the muster point all suited, booted and medalled.  The group were all on one of the decks ready to be photographed by a helicopter when his name was called out and the Captain presented him with a cheque &#8211; he was both emotional and honoured that his piers had chosen him.  Another honour came later that year when he again was one of three D-Day 1 vets to be invited to a Garden Party at Buckingham Palace.  Again he was overwhelmed when he mentioned the Garden Party to another member of the RE Association, who in turn told someone else, and dad ended up being chauffeur driven from home to the Palace &#8211; the two other vets had to catch a train, not fair I know but as it goes &#8216;it&#8217;s not what you know but who you know&#8217;.</p>
<p>So, needless to say I was disappointed at how much of the Ark I saw and sad that she rests in what is basically the Government version of ebay.</p>
<p>It is expensive to get in but entry allows you one visit to HMS Ark Royal, Harbour tour and Mary Rose Museum but unlimited access for 12 months to the other sections of the site &#8211; a good place to visit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wakefieldfhs.org.uk/blog/2012/03/naval-dockyard-portsmouth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

